🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.